Prep by Company
Software Dev Engineer SDE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Data Engineer DE ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Software Engineer SWE Product Manager PM Data Scientist DS Solutions Architect SA ML Engineer MLE Technical PM TPM
Guides About Get Your Playbook →
The Bar Raiser's Debrief · Amazon Product Manager

"What product would you kill at Amazon and why?"

Are Right, A Lot Product Manager 5–7 min
Why candidates fail: Candidates either dodge the question with a vague hypothetical product or pick an obvious struggling product, revealing shallow strategic judgment and no real conviction.
Two voices. One question. The insider reaction you don't usually see.
Also on YouTube 5–7 min 2026
"What product would you kill at Amazon and why?"
Competency tested
Are Right, A Lot
Who asks it
Bar Raiser · HM · Peer
What they're really asking
Can you form and defend a hard judgment call?
The answer that fails — and why
Candidate answer Does not raise the bar — Are Right, A Lot

I would look at Amazon Spark — the social shopping feed Amazon launched a few years back. It never really gained traction with customers, and social commerce is a crowded space with Instagram and Pinterest already owning that behavior. Amazon's core strength is intent-based shopping, not discovery-led engagement. The resources invested there could have been redeployed toward improving recommendations on the core shopping experience, which has a much clearer customer value proposition and a more direct path to conversion.

Bar Raiser evaluation
Chose a product Amazon already discontinued — no risk taken.
No steelman offered — assumed the case against it was obvious.
Resource reallocation claim made without any supporting rationale.
Opinion asserted without data, customer signal, or business framing.
Prefer to hear it? Watch the video for the two-voice delivery with live reaction commentary.
Amazon debrief · PM loop · Bar Raiser evaluation Below Bar
Leadership Principle: Are Right, A Lot
Does not demonstrate Are Right, A Lot.
Selected an already-discontinued product — no genuine conviction required.
Failed to steelman existing business case before arguing against it.
No customer signal, usage data, or opportunity cost framing offered.
Recommendation lacks specificity — redeployment claim is asserted, not argued.
interview101.com · Are Right, A Lot · Amazon PM · Bar Raiser debrief reference
Now here's what a strong answer actually sounds like
The answer that works — in full
Strong answer Raises the bar — Are Right, A Lot

I would sunset Amazon Sidewalk. The honest case for it is real — mesh networking for low-bandwidth IoT is a genuine customer need, and the opt-in network effect is architecturally clever. But the data tells a different story: consumer awareness remains low, the privacy backlash at launch cost significant trust, and third-party developer adoption has been thin. The opportunity cost is significant — the same connectivity and edge-compute investment redirected toward Alexa's ambient intelligence roadmap would reach hundreds of millions of existing Echo customers rather than a small subset. I would wind down new Sidewalk partnerships, honor existing commitments through a two-year sunset window, and publish a clear customer communication. The freed engineering capacity goes to ambient sensing on devices customers already own.

Bar Raiser evaluation
Steelmanned Sidewalk's architecture before arguing against it — intellectual honesty.
Grounded the case in customer signal, developer adoption, and opportunity cost.
Proposed a specific sunset mechanism — not just a conclusion.
Connected resource reallocation to a named, scaled customer outcome.
Amazon debrief · PM loop · Bar Raiser evaluation Raises Bar
Leadership Principle: Are Right, A Lot
Strong signal. Raises the bar.
Acknowledged product's legitimate value before building the case against it.
Used customer signal, developer adoption, and opportunity cost as evidence pillars.
Proposed a concrete sunset mechanism — shows ownership, not just opinion.
Reallocation tied to scaled customer outcome on an existing product surface.
interview101.com · Are Right, A Lot · Amazon PM · Bar Raiser debrief reference
Run your story through these three questions
1
Can you explain why a smart Amazon team built this product in the first place?
If you cannot steelman it, you have not earned the right to kill it.
2
What specific customer or business signal tells you the product is failing its purpose?
Without evidence, your opinion is a preference, not a judgment.
3
Where exactly do those resources go, and which customers benefit at what scale?
Vague reallocation is not a recommendation — it is a dodge.
Get your personalized report
How do your real stories score?
Get a personalized report scored against the interview rubric Amazon uses for your role.
Get your Amazon Product Manager report →
Other questions from the same loop
Each video covers a different competency tested in the Amazon Product Manager loop
Explore the full Amazon Product Manager prep hub